By Karim Were
Proceedings in the high-profile trial of Christopher Okello Onyum took a procedural turn as the court emphasized clarity and order in handling defence applications.
After Okello stepped down from the stand, his legal team introduced a new witness, first securing a court order to limit media coverage. Presiding judge Alice Komuhangi Khaukha approved the request, allowing the witness to testify anonymously while wearing a mask and cap, citing the need for protection.
The witness, who appeared in a blue outfit, proceeded to give testimony that supported Okello’s earlier statements, particularly regarding his time at Butabika National Referral Hospital. Defence lawyer Richard Kombuga guided the questioning to reinforce this line of evidence.
However, the court’s focus shifted when the defence sought to summon unspecified “doctors from Butabika” to testify. Justice Komuhangi Khaukha challenged the request, pointing out its lack of precision and urging the defence to clearly identify the individuals they intended to call.
The application was swiftly opposed by state prosecutor Jonathan Muwaganya, who argued that it did not meet procedural standards.
The case stems from the killing of four toddlers at a daycare centre in Ggaba, a suburb of Kampala, an incident that has drawn significant public attention. As the trial continues, the court appears to be balancing the defence’s efforts to introduce psychiatric-related evidence with the need to maintain strict procedur
al discipline.
